Apaak Criticizes Another Swearing-In of Speaker as President
National Democratic Congress [NDC] Member of Parliament for Builsa South, Dr. Clement Apaak, is upset with what he calls the impromptu summoning of Parliament for the second swearing-in of the Speaker of Parliament, Professor Aaron Mike Oquaye, to act as President in less than a week.
Speaking to Citi News after the announcement in Parliament on Friday, Dr. Apaak said the processes prescribed by law were inconveniencing several MPs.
“As I speak to you, myself and many of my colleagues have engagements and activities in our constituencies and we are to leave, and yet we are expected to come back to the House at 8:30 am to swear in the Speaker as President. I don’t think it is sustainable.”
The MP said the government needs to provide some clarity on the matter to legislators.
“… So it is entirely the responsibility of the government of the day to come clean so that we can understand the conditions that would warrant us to make the kinds of sacrifices that we are expected to make. As it is now, we don’t understand the full story and a lot of us don’t feel that it is justified to always come in at the nick of time, as they did today, for us to come in tomorrow and swear in the Speaker as the acting President,” Dr. Apaak added.
Nana Addo heading for AU Summit
The swearing-in on Saturday, which is mandated by Article 60 (11) and (12) of the 1992 Constitution, has been necessitated by President Nana Akufo-Addo’s expected trip to Addis Ababa for the AU Summit.
The Vice President, Dr. Bawumia, also left Ghana for the United Kingdom on Friday night on medical leave after he took ill earlier in the day, and was undergoing medical checks.
According to Article 60 (11) and (12) of the 1992 Constitution, “(11) Where the President and the Vice-President are both unable to perform the functions of the President, the Speaker of Parliament shall perform those functions until the President or the Vice-President is able to perform those functions or a new President assumes office, as the case may be.” “(12) The Speaker shall, before commencing to perform the functions of the President under clause (11) of this article, take and subscribe the oath set out in relation to the office of President.”
Controversy over swearing-in
The law concerning the swearing-in was breached by a former Speaker of Parliament, Doe Adjaho in 2014, when he refused to take the oath of office as acting President at a point.
Both President Mahama and his Vice Kwesi Amissah-Arthur had traveled outside the country at the time.
This compelled the Managing Director of Citi FM, Samuel Atta-Mensah, and a United States-based Ghanaian lawyer, Prof. Kwaku Asare, to file a suit at the Supreme Court, to among other things, seek an interpretation of Article 60 (12) of the 1992 Constitution, which requires that the Speaker takes the oath of office each time he is to act as President.
The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, declared that the Speaker of Parliament, Edward Doe Adjaho, violated Article 60 (11)-(12) of the 1992 Constitution when he declined to be sworn in to act as President.
The nine-member panel, presided over by Justice Sophia Akuffo, also averred that the “Speaker of Parliament shall always, before assuming the functions of the Office of President when the President and the Vice-President are unable to perform their functions, take and subscribe to the oath set out in relation to the Office of President”.
Some political scientists have challenged the interpretation of the constitution and argue that when the elected President, Nana Akufo-Addo is still acting in his capacity as President outside the country, it is unnecessary to swear in an acting President.