Bright Simons Talks Down On Africa’s 30% Minerals Reserves Mantra

Bright Simons, the Vice President of IMANI Centre for Policy and Education and a renowned policy analyst, has launched a critique against the widely circulated statistic that Africa holds 30% of the world’s mineral reserves, describing it as a “comforting hallucination.”

Bright Simons argued that this figure, often used as a geopolitical trophy by Pan-Africanists and a stick by activists to lash out at underperforming leaders, has fostered a dangerous sense of complacency across the continent.

According to Bright Simons, the mantra suggests that immense wealth is imminent and only requires “political will” to unlock, while the granular data reveals a far more precarious reality for Africa’s industrial future.

“But what if this number is not just wrong, but dangerous? This statistic is a sedative: a comforting hallucination that has fostered a dangerous complacency. The reality, when stripped of rhetorical gloss, is that Africa is suffering from ‘strategic precarity” noted by Bright Simons.

The “strategic precarity” identified by Bright Simons suggests that while Africa appears dominant in high-unit-value minerals like platinum group metals which excite investment bankers it is actually “supply-deficient” in the industrial minerals that drive structural economic transformation.

For essential feedstock such as iron, copper, bauxite, and zinc, Africa’s median share of global reserves and production hovers at a meager 2% and 5% respectively.

This imbalance means that a modest industrial take-off in even a few African economies would quickly collide with mineral constraints, potentially turning the continent into a net importer of the very materials it is assumed to have in abundance.

Bright Simons provides a sobering historical corrective to the “looting” narrative that dominates African political thought, pointing out that historical industrial titans like Britain and Germany rose on the back of massive domestic mining output rather than just foreign ores.

In 1913 alone, the United Kingdom produced 292 million tonnes of coal, a figure that dwarfs the 234 million tonnes produced by the entire African continent in 2023. This “false nostalgia” leads to the strategic delusion that simply “wising up” will change Africa’s fortunes.

Without a shift in strategy, Bright Simons warns that the continent will “sleepwalk into an industrial ditch” as mineral rents continue to function as mere foreign exchange flows rather than the building blocks of domestic production.

At the heart of this crisis is what Simons terms “Katanomics” the structural fracture between political ambition, policy design, and actual execution.

This syndrome is vividly illustrated by Ghana’s Ewoyaa Lithium Project, where political narratives of historic value capture collided with “analogue governance” and a lack of rigorous fiscal modeling.

To bridge this gap, Bright Simons proposes a “digital salvation” through the deployment of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and “Sovereign Intelligence.”

By moving beyond the “abundance mindset,” African states can use digital tools to manage information, automate value capture, and close knowledge gaps that currently give foreign investors an asymmetric advantage at the negotiating table.

To effectively benefit from its reserves, Bright Simons argued that Africa must pivot from “resource nationalism” to “smart sovereignty.”

This involves the use of “digital mineral intelligence” platforms for national geological data and technology-driven licensing systems.